Chisholm Climate Candidate Scorecard information page

Your vote matters – makes sure it’s based on the facts!

Voters deserve accurate information about the candidates climate policies.

Chisholm Climate Candidates Scorecard

Summaries of candidates policies and scorecard rationale

The parties and candidates have been rated across seven categories, and summarised in a scorecard, to inform your vote.

Each policy has been scored as  GOOD, FAIR or POOR based on the candidates’ published policies.

We have made every effort to be objective and fair in our scoring. Summaries of each candidate’s policies were prepared, and where we did not have prior confirmation, we endeavoured to contact candidates so they could review and correct them before we finalised our scoring. Some Parties/Candidates did not respond. Policies were scored using simple and clear criteria, and you can find the full scoring rationale here. Short on time? Compare candidates’ responses to key questions in our comparative forum quotes pdf here.

 

Senate Vote Climate Voting Guide

Chisholm Climate Scorecard Senate voting guide

Preferential Voting

Preferential voting means your vote is not wasted if your first preference doesn’t win. If your first preference doesn’t win, your vote is transferred to you second preference and so on.

For the strongest climate vote, put all the strong climate candidates before all the others.

 

Chisholm Candidate Climate Scorecard back

     To see more detail you can press on the image above for it to enlarge

Climate action not only lowers the cost of living but protects our quality of life 

Supporting solar PV saves solar household around $1200 per annum

  • Fully electric household with an EV can save over $4000 each year, even including paying off the upfront costs at 5%!
  • Climate care is health care – acting on climate will reduce deaths and illness from increasing heat stress.
  • Clean energy is the least cost option according to AEMO, and storage makes power from the sun and wind available 24/7

Power from nuclear reactors is very expensive – up to $600bn, all paid for by the taxpayer – and will take too long, with experts saying first power would not occur till the mid 2040s.

Vote for strong climate action, for solar, going electric, protecting our forests and green spaces.

Vote for a safe climate future and the health of our communities and those we love.

 

 

Chisholm is a key seat

  • Chisholm is held by Carina Garland for the ALP on a tight margin of 3.3%
  • In the 2024 redistribution Chisholm gained Liberal leading parts of Higgins, and lost Labor leaning voters to Deakin and Hotham, dropping an expected margin from 6.4% to 3.2 o 3.3% according to the ABC.
  • In a detailed post, Ben Raue agrees with the redistribution margin change of 6.4% to 3.3%
  • Antony Green agrees with 3.3% in a post that discusses the overall balancing in the seven year redistribution process.
Map of Division of Chisholm and electoral information

Climate action is good for the economy

Climate action saves

Health is the most important thing we have got

  • Acting on climate will improve the health of our communities and those we love
  • Find out more on our health and climate page

Why risk nuclear?

  • Nuclear is far too slow, far too expensive and will drastically increase climate pollution
  • Got a couple of minutes? You can scan through our nuclear information page or dive into the links

Say ‘Yes’ to clean energy

  • The shift to abundant, safe sun and wind power is unstoppable
  • Clean energy benefits all Australians. Find out more here.

Further Information

This scorecard was developed by members of the Chisholm Climate Action Network and Kooyong Climate Change Alliance scorecard working group including Lighter Footprints.

Chisholm Climate Action Network (Chisholm CAN)

Along with partner local climate groups, Lighter Footprints is a member of Chisholm CAN.
LF is assisting Chisholm CAN in running climate conversations, pre-poll and polling day events as part of the non-partisan Vote Climate campaign in Chisholm.

Lighter Footprints

  • Connect with the Chisholm Votes Climate campaign here.
  • Catch the Chisholm Candidates forum in a detailed Facebook album with key quotes, candidates statements in the comments and expert links.
  • You’re busy? We’ve put together a nifty comparison set of key candidate responses to all questions. Check out the full presentation video here.
  • Look through our Candidate Forum blog for a fast take on nuclear vs renewables, plus where do they stand on helping us go electric, and key quotes.
  • Not sure about nuclear? Check out veteran nuclear-free campaigner Dave Sweeney talking about what’s behind the seven reactor plan and what it might mean in this short video.

 

This page is authorised by Lighter Footprints Inc, Register Number A0095302A, Kew Victoria